July 2007Issue 402


Backlash in Latin America

Bank off!

Countries are booting out the World Bank

Paul Wolfowitz’s indiscretions are not the only cause of headaches at the World Bank. Latin American countries are paying off their loans early, cutting ties with the institution, and creating their own financing instruments instead.

Since its creation over 60 years ago, the World Bank has provided trillions of dollars in loans to poor countries. In Latin America, financing by the Bank accounts for 20 per cent of multilateral lending, and comes with policy prescriptions, made into ‘conditions’, that interfere with governments’ rights to make sovereign decisions.

At the same time, persistent poverty in Latin America has barely budged. Now there is a clear backlash. In 2006, presidential elections were held in 12 Latin American countries. In six, leftwing candidates won, and in another four, Left parties made considerable progress. Economic policy was a dominant theme in all the campaigns. Candidates who were critical of the conservative, pro-business, free-market economic policies of their predecessors fared much better than supporters of the Washington-favoured status quo.

In April, Venezuela announced that it was paying off all its $3.3 billion debt to the World Bank, five years ahead of schedule. Venezuelan Minister of Finance Rodrigo Cabezas said: ‘Venezuela is free... and, thank God, neither today’s Venezuelans nor children yet to be born will owe one single cent to this organization.’ Argentina, Brazil and Ecuador have also paid off their debts to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) – and others have expressed a desire to do the same.

Later in April, in the wake of the Wolfowitz corruption scandal, President Chávez declared that Venezuela was withdrawing from membership of the World Bank and the IMF completely. At the same time, Ecuador expelled the Bank’s representative in that country, declaring him persona non grata. These decisions could help strengthen the efforts of other developing countries seeking to reform the World Bank, by demonstrating that choosing not to be part of it is a real option.

Increasingly frustrated by their dependence on capital – and influence – from the United States and Europe, some governments have begun thinking about alternatives. While the World Bank suffers its most damaging scandal to date, plans for a new, independent regional bank have been advancing quickly.

Earlier this year, Venezuela and Argentina launched the new Banco del Sur (Bank of the South), pledging more than $1 billion to get the institution up and running in the next few months. Brazil, Bolivia, Ecuador and Paraguay have agreed to join, and Nicaragua, several Caribbean countries and a few Asian nations have also expressed interest.

In a clear departure from the undemocratic and paternalistic governance structure of the World Bank – where voting privileges are based on financial contribution, giving the US Treasury the largest share of the vote – Banco del Sur assures potential members that no-one will be the ‘sole owner’. Although not yet fully defined, indications are that voting power will be based on financial need, rather than monetary contribution or political weight.

The real challenge will be to create an institution that not only looks different to its predecessors, but actually thinks and acts differently.

Nadia Martinez/Foreign Policy in Focus




Language Tools
Powered by Ultralingua

Join over 10,000 people just like you. Get e-mail updates about new content, issue alerts, contests, and more!

other articles
FROM THIS ISSUE

Burundi
A small landlocked state in central Africa, sandwiched between its vast neighbours Tanzania and Democratic Republic of Congo, Burundi has suffered as much from ethnic conflict as its other (equally tiny) neighbour, Rwanda. Yet while the 1993 Rwandan genocide continues to commandeer international attention, Burundi’s travails tend to slip under the radar.

Of robbers and plants
Economic crunch in Mauritius

Edible Earth
In search of bright ideas, David Ransom begins by learning some very basic lessons about how to design a more sustainable, permanent culture.

The ethical heart of permaculture
Maddy Harland outlines the principles that make it beat.

The Islamophobia debate
When is it fair to criticize Islam and when is it not?

more articles
ON RELATED TOPICS

Forest fever
It's 2010. Brazilian activists Marcelo Calazans and Renata Valentim imagine what the future might look like if the carbon market continues to grow.

At the top of the hill
A poet’s view of from Rio’s favelas by Gabriela Tôrres Barbosa.

Zenilda da Silva Vilacio
Janet Smith visits a determined indigenous woman fighting for the rights of women and of her people in the Brazilian Amazon.

Creative moneymaking
Money problems? Print your own! That's what one small town in Brazil has been doing to try to solve its economic problems.

Polyp's Big Bad World – July 2005
A bedtime story from the IMF Book of Fairytales.

recently
IN THIS COLUMN

‘Maroon the gays’
Ugandans facing a barrage of discrimination

Correa kicks out the dimwit
Ecuador intends to kick the US Air Force off Manta airbase

Fishy carbon credits
Companies profit from toxic dumping in the sea

‘Francanola’ threatens Aussies
Australians support the ban on GM crops

A little plot of earth
Poor Indian farmers on the march

Citizens attacked
Palestinian refugees attacked in Lebanon.






Voices from the margins:

Multimedia: video, podcasts, and more.