|

Canadian
Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility
Box 236, Snowdon Post Office
Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Tel: 842-1473
AIMS
To provide a network and resources for Canadian groups concerned
about the implications of nuclear power.
To demand a national public debate on Canada’s energy
needs, and the establishment of a moratorium on the licensing
and export of new nuclear facilities until the results of such
a debate are made known.
To
provide educational material to the general public on the subject
of nuclear technology while advocating the use of conservation
measures and renewable energy sources.
METHODS
Printing and distribution documentation and general information
on nuclear reactor safety; nuclear waste disposal; uranium
exploration, mining, refining and export; the connection
between nuclear power and nuclear weapons; energy economics/labour,
medical implications of nuclear technology; alternative
energy and conservation; nuclear weapons proliferation.
Interventions
at government hearings and presentations to inquiries across
Canada Co-operation with member and
non-member
organizations
on publications and events dealing with a variety of
social issues relating to energy, the environment, labour, and
weapons proliferation.
SUCCESSES
Comprehensive resource centre in Montreal available to
activists, groups, the media, students, and the general
public.
Existence
of numerous local groups across Canada in areas affected by nuclear
development uranium mining
and refining.
nuclear
reactors: waste disposal. Assistance to these groups
in the form of speakers, technical research, and
printed material.
Frequent
and increasingly thorough coverage by all media due to regular
contact and the provision
of information and resources.
FAILURES
Less than frequent communication with member groups
and individuals. Insufficient French language
documentation.
FUTURE
PLANS
To research the potential military Implications
of Canadian nuclear exports.
To research more thoroughly the economic
and legal aspects of nuclear power development
in Canada.
To focus on uranium mining as a key issue. |
 |

International
Work Group for Indigenous Affairs
Flolstraede 10,
Dk-1171
Copenhagen
k.
Denmark
AIMS
To create international understanding. knowledge and concern
about the indigenous peoples situation.
To
influence political and economic powers nationally and internationally
in order to:
— prevent physical and cultural extermination
— fight racism
— secure political, economic and social rights
— establish and secure indigenous peoples traditional rights
and support their struggle for self- determination.
METHODS
From indigenous peoples themselves and from investigators,
who have lived in relevant territories, we collect information,
which is published in the ZWGIA documents and Newsletter
series.
We
also give financial support to projects and other activities
undertaken by indigenous peoples own organizations.
SUCCESSES
Through our 13 years of existence it has gradually become
more difficult to exterminate indigenous peoples without
strong
reactions from the outside world. During recent years
we have seen a rising consciousness among the public.
Many
new indigenous organizations have been created and are now
in contact with each other exchanging experiences.
FAILURES
Cultural extermination is still a very serious problem
and is difficult to fight. Due to lack of resources
we have not
been able to focus and build a contact-network
in Asia and Africa, such as we have in other parts of
the world.
Most
European governments are still ignoring the situation
of indigenous
peoples, although they have been fully informed
and
lobbied throughout the years.
FUTURE
PLANS
Generally we will try getting more information
from Asia and Africa and continue the pressure
on governments
and
organizations.
HELP
NEEDED
More subscribers so our publications and more
informants. |
 |

Overseas
Development Committee
P.O. Box 5113
Wellington. New Zealand
Tel: Wellington 757-56 1
AIMS
To make isolated, under-populated, still-comfortable New Zealand
more aware of the issues of international development.
To
press for positive action on these issues.
To
do this work with as many development agencies as possible.
In 1981, 18 agencies were affiliated so ODC and we worked
with many others.
METHODS
Our style is courteous, our methods reason and persuasion— even
when the effort to be polite nearly kills us.
Development
education is pursued through a monthly newsletter on major
issues and new thinking abroad, publication
of a Development Directory, and media contributions
so she
development
debate.
Political
lobbying. involvement in the formation of policies, and the
initiation of meetings and conferences.
SUCCESSES
In the pressing of political parties to make definite
commitments on development issues.
The
publication of material which has been used and re-used by
groups throughout the country.
The
initiating of national conferences in 1974 and 1978. These
were successful in clarifying
some complex
issues,
putting
development groups in touch with each other
and promoting useful activity.
FAILURES
In not creating a truly national network. This
is due partly to our voluntary status and
the lack of
full-time
or paid
staff.
In
not getting through to the very powerful producer boards and
business firms involved
in development
projects abroad.
But we’re working on them.
FUTURE
PLANS
To have contacts capable of speaking
on development issues in every centre.
To
keep encouraging the development agencies to work together,
not only on new or
once-off projects,
but
in more basic
and everyday needs.
To
keep lobbying until New Zealand’s development record
improves.
HELP
NEEDED
From groups around the country who
share our continuing concerns about
poverty,
racism. trade and aid for
development, and
the need for an adequate response. |
 |