![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
NEW
INTERNATIONALIST 158 |
||||||||||||||||||||
THIS
MONTH'S THEME |
||||||||||||||||||||
SEX & THE POLITICS OF PLEASURE |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Give
and take Power and pleasure Paradise lost Safety
in numbers Sons and daughters of Islam Understanding porn Reluctant lovers The coming-out crusade High moral principles The longing to belong No Kidding |
||||||||||||||||||||
FROM
THIS MONTH'S EDITOR |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
In my case the bosses include me. The NI is produced by a co-operative, which makes all the decisions about the running of the magazine. The actual contents of the magazine and its political 'line' (oh, didn't you notice we had one?) is controlled by an editorial collective and thrashed out in interminable meetings, at which all members of the co-op are welcome, but which no-one but editors can bear to sit through. It was at one of these meetings that we decided the magazine needed a bit of a facelift. If you've been reading the NI for several years - either because you actually like the magazine, or because you never seem to get around to cancelling your subscription - you will have noticed that we have become much more concerned with personal politics recently: with things like racism and feminism, as well as with poverty. It's a reflection of our belief that poverty and inequality - like charity - begin at home. And it's a belief culled directly from the women's movement. This shift of emphasis has had a mixed reception. People seem to read the magazine more avidly. But they also object more vociferously if articles challenge their personal beliefs and lifestyles. We would argue that both responses mean that the NI is doing its job better than it used to. What point is there in preaching to the converted? So, having gradually effected an ideological change, we decided to alter the look of the magazine too. You will already have noticed the new logo ('New Internationalist' is such a mouthful, we decided to keep the concept, but dispense with some of the syllables). Inside there are changes too: more visual features, new page layout, new features - like this Letter from the Editor, for instance. I should mention the subject of this month's issue: sex. It's a topic we've been planning to tackle for years. But we've never quite plucked up the courage before: because it's a subject which - more than any other - touches people where it hurts most: in their most personal of personal lives. I found researching the topic harrowing. The dark side of sex - pornography, persecution of gays, genital mutilation, rape, incest, child prostitution - overwhelmed me and turned me away from my (male) partner for a while. It seemed almost indecent to look for pleasure in an arena where so much pain is inflicted. And it's the pervasiveness of that pain that makes sex a subject for the NI. Psychiatrist David Cooper once said that if sex is the joyful joining of two people in mutual pleasure, then we should do it as much as possible, because there is not enough joy in the world. I agree with the sentiment. But at the moment I'm not sure it's possible to equate sex with joy. |
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Debbie Taylor
for the New Internationalist Co-operative |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Letters
COVER PHOTO: Claude Sauvageot |
||||||||||||||||||||



I NEVER read the Letter from the Editor in other magazines. I find myself getting too irritated with the pally, intimate tone and the fact that it usually tells me things I don't really want to know - the name of the subeditor they've just hired, for instance, or how drunk the staff got at the Christmas party. It all rings a bit false. So why am I sitting here writing one? For the same reasons any other editor does, I suppose. In order to justify my editorial position, to engender a bit of 'readership identification' - and because the bosses told me to.
