new internationalist
issue 188 - October 1988

The New Internationalist welcomes your
letters. But please keep them short.
They may be edited for purposes of space or clarity.
Include a home telephone number if possible and send your letters
to the nearest editorial office or e-mail to : ni@newint.org
Mental block
Why
does your Personal Violence issue (NI 187)
pay so much attention to physical violence and hardly any to mental cruelty?
Could it have something to do with the fact that most physical violence is perpetrated
by men and it is simply easier to point the finger of blame at them?
While appreciating that personal violence is a huge subject for a 32-page magazine to tackle I feel that the issue could have focussed on the more subtle - and often more harmful - forms it can take. A sarcastic parent, for example, may do a lot more damage than one who slaps a child when naughty but treats them with respect the rest of the time. A manipulative, verbally vicious woman may be far more dangerous than a physically aggressive man. And what about the violence to the person caused by hunger and poverty? These are only alluded to in Dan Vega's piece from Peru.
Dick Vincent
Portsmouth,
UK
Fighting talk
When will these people who advocate out-dated ideas like socialist
revolution' cease plaguing your Letters page? While they are out selling
Militant or holding public meetings, we NI readers are getting
down to things that matter. These socialists must realize that the
road to liberation in the Third World depends on progressive people in this
country using ecologically sound transport (cycling), wearing radical T-shirts
(at great personal cost), and agonizing about our sexual roles. What do socialists
have to offer that can rival this deep commitment?
Colleagues! The New Internationalist revolution is coming! A wave of middle-class guilt and 'One World' sweatshirts will sweep the globe, fascist dictatorships will crumble before the onslaught of spiky-haired people with non-competitive life-styles, a new sun will rise on a world purged of nasty rough people and individuals with awful taste in interior decoration. Until that great day, let us hold our coffee mugs high, whatever the risk, and wear our T-shirts with pride.
Max Neil
Preston. UK
Seedy suggestion
Although New Zealand earns more than 90 per cent of its forestry foreign
exchange from exotic coniferous plantations, it is not comparable with most
other sellers of tropical hardwoods (Facts
NI 184). Burma, Malaysia
and Indonesia mine their indigenous forests with little concern for the long-term
sustainability of their resources, whilst New Zealand practices sustainable
forestry using exotic forests planted 70 years ago. These trees were grown
precisely to preserve New Zealand's indigenous forests, and as a result the
natural forests have increased. Your June issue would have done well to address
the dire need to accelerate reforestation, because this is a process which
is far more likely to reduce the pressures on the world's forest resources,
than the lofty (but unrealistic aim) of changing the consumption patterns
of the developed world.
Steve Johnson
School of Forestry,
Canterbury,
UK
Blind spot
Is photography yet another form of exploitation? While white people
from the North are usually named in close-up media shots, non-whites from
the South are not. This trend can be seen in 'Third World' slide-shows, fund-raising
adverts for Ethiopians and now (Allah preserve us), the NI. How many
people in NI 185 (apart from
Fidel Castro and the photographers) were afforded the simple courtesy of being
named? Please take or find photographs that provide names for the faces: your
subjects deserve this, every bit as much as you, me... or even Fidel Castro.
Greg Whitehead
Development
Education Group, Australia
Cutting words
The lack of balance, depth and self-righteousness of your magazine
inspires increasing irritation. I did however read your coverage of the devastation
of the world's forests with some sympathy (NI
184): the greatest contribution you could make to the cause would
be to cease publication.
Christopher Maconochie
Sussex,
UK

Cartoon: Cath Jackson
Time-bomb tension
The Philippines is sitting on an environmental 'time-bomb' and a major
part of the problem is the imminent loss of its vital forest. The archipelago
suffered a 55% forest loss between 1960 and 1985 (the Marcos years) and the
trend is continuing today, with 250,000 acres being destroyed annually.
A recent satellite scan showed the densely populated island of Cebu has zero forest; 60% of the land is severely eroded and the rivers are silting up, killing fish and causing floods. It is estimated that there will be no primary forest left in the Philippines by the year 2000.
Meanwhile in the race for export dollars, commercial loggers are given a virtual 'carte blanche' to clear fell, cut undersized logs, finance illegal loggers and to log areas defined as National Parks and Reserves. Squads of armed thugs enforce the loggers' power, often with the connivance of local and national politicians and governments departments.
Larry Marshall,
Quezon City, Philippines
Nailed down
The letter from M J Hughes (Letters
NI 184) seems to be saying:
'Fair's fair. If the blokes have to fix everything, then the women gotta do
their share.' But unfortunately many men still do not think it appropriate for
women to dig ditches or mix cement. Women who dare don a pair of overalls, are
immediately labelled 'butch' and 'dykes', though what sexuality has to do hammering
in a nail, I still can't fathom.
Lydia Bezeruk
Semaphore, South Africa
Loose connections
I endorse the spirit of the Housework issue (NI
181) that men should take a greater responsibility for the maintenance
of the family, but nowhere do you define what you mean by 'housework'. There
seems to be a loose assumption that 'housework is what women do'. But if it
is understood as the unpaid work necessary for the maintenance of the family
and home, does it not also include mowing the lawns, painting the house, fixing
a blocked drain and so on, which tend to be jobs done by men on their days
off? Even if the definition hinges around the term 'unpaid', it applies even
less to developing nations since many people live in a subsistence economy
where almost all work is unpaid. Also, when you consider that most Third World
people do not live as nuclear families but in extended village communities,
the term 'housework' becomes even more meaningless. Women are not going to
make much progress so long as the association between women, house and children
survives.
Christina Reymer
New Ireland Province,
Papua New Guinea
Gene screen
A Molecular Auschwitz by Dick Russell (NI
182), raised many well-founded concerns about genetic manipulation
technologies and their applications. They are fully shared by the Australian
Conservation Foundation which recently began a campaign to ensure the mandatory
notification, assessment and control of genetic engineering in this country.
We would like to hear from NI readers who have information to share
about these hazards and strategies for dealing with them.
Bob Phelps,
Campaign Officer,
Australian Conservation Foundation, Hawthorn,
Victoria 3122, Australia
Soft on slugs
I am trying to grow a nice traditional garden which is being invaded
by slugs. Of course slug pellets could kill them easily, but they take days
to die: it just won't do. Under the advice of a friend, I tried putting them
in a jar of salt water. Terrible. Finally I transported them to a nearby field,
but what a drag. Of course I have thought of more radical means, like treading
on them, but it makes me feel like Hitler. As you are a fairly humanitarian
magazine I thought you might help.
C Fraser
Oxford, UK
Editor: You can write to the following address for a leaflet on the non-chemical control of slugs: Advisory Officer, Henry Doubleday Research Association, Ryton-on-Dunsmore, Coventry CV8 3LG, UK.
Money matters
The underlying assumption in the Housework issue (NI
181), is that a 'housewife' is a white, metropolitan, married mother.
But the reality is that housework is inseparable from poverty, which this issue
of NI hardly mentions. Women have to work like crazy because we don't
have the money not to, and the less money we have, the more work we are forced
to do. Is help from men to clean our slums all we want? (The implication is
that the single women who head 20%-40% of the world's families will have to
get a man if they want assistance.) Why concentrate on re-distributing the work,
when if we redistribute the wealth we can abolish so much drudgery? One move
in the right direction was the United Nation's 1985 decision, to count women's
unwaged work as part of every country s Gross National Product. The debate on
housework must begin with the recognition that women's work is essential to
the economy.
Lisa Longstaff
Wages for Housework Campaign,
London, UK
ERRATUM: Tartrazine E102 is a food additive to be avoided - not E120 as stated in Diet of Violence NI 187). Our apologies for this printing error.
![]() |
The views
expressed in these letters are not necessarily those of the New Internationalist
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||


Children
of the moon 