![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NEW INTERNATIONALIST 247 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| THIS MONTH'S THEME | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
History |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FROM THIS MONTH'S EDITOR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It's hard to believe the Sixties are history. I always assumed that it was still the Sixties - or at least that the decade was so seminal that history could never be understood in quite the same way again. But now there are dozens of books, films and TV shows turning over the bones and artifacts to discover the true meaning of 'peace, love and good vibes'. Hold on a second - these are my bones. My sense of self and society were forged in the Sixties, in youth culture, the Quebec student movement and revulsion over the Vietnam War. The baby boomers of the Sixties share the
fatal conceit of every generation that theirs is a pivotal and unchallengeable
role in history - made worse in our case by our numbers and by the heated
passions (some would say illusions) of the time. So as part of putting together
this issue on the uses and abuses of history I went to a conference entitled
'Towards a History of the Sixties'. I At the Conference I ran into a different kind of criticism entirely. Younger activists were quick to point out that celebrating a nostalgic history of Sixties radicalism was simply not good enough. Many felt that they had been living too long in the shadow of the Sixties, forced to relive its myths. One participant, writer LA Kaufman, said that she felt the Conference 'was like coming to someone else's class reunion'. Veterans of the movement were offering answers that did not seem to fit the questions of their younger colleagues. It was a painful process to watch. It also posed a central dilemma for me about history. How can the historical experience of one generation be passed to the next without the myth-making and resentment that so often prevents us from seriously coming to grips with the past? This is something we all experience first with our parents and then with our children, if we have them. But it also affects the public realm. A classic recent case here in Canada saw World War Two veterans trying to suppress a National Film Board production by younger directors that revealed uncomfortable truths about the firebombing of Dresden. Is it possible to respect the space for each generation to 'start over' while giving them the historical raw material to do so effectively? The present is in a profound sense always in the process of becoming history - but handling its transmission is a delicate process fraught with pitfalls. This issue suggests how to avoid the worst of these. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Myth and memory The curse of Kosovo Temple wars Can memory survive? Digging into silence Highways into history The cloak of power Confessions
of a war historian Hidden from history Old passions, new visions |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Letters FRONT COVER PHOTOMONTAGE BY RICHARD SLY |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Richard Swift
for the New Internationalist Co-operative |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||



already
knew that conservatives saw the decade as altogether too noisy, too intemperate,
too unrealistic. In the rigged marketplace of public opinion former radicals
like David Horowitz are trying to turn the Sixties into a code word for excess
and irresponsibility - for 'living beyond our means'. 
