| NEW INTERNATIONALIST 315 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| THIS MONTH'S THEME | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The great
The Coke Dude Gender canyon A quiet escape
Testing, testing,
123 IDEAL and
Reality Dancin' circles Class wars Making it happen Teaching
Global Issues |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Education |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| FROM THIS MONTH'S EDITOR | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The editor's letter is always the last part of any New Internationalist issue to be written. Which is odd, really, given that it may well be the first thing people read - not because it appears first, but because it is short, approachable and personal. It may suffer occasionally as a result of the brain-dead state that editors are liable to fall into near the end of the production process. Like many magazines, I imagine, we are currently re-evaluating what we do, spurred on by the all-invasive millennium deadline. And as part of that review the editor's letter has looked vulnerable. 'It's a bit of fluff,' some have said. 'If it rehearses the arguments in the main section it's boring, while any pretence that it gives readers a demystifying glimpse behind the scenes (its original rationale) has long gone.' If these arguments are true, my own guess
is that it is only because we aren't hitting the right notes. So what would that be in this case? Perhaps the wrangling over whether we should cover the danger that the millennium bug in computers could set off nuclear weapons. This small matter of possibly imminent Armageddon did not loom fully into view until I was well down the road with an issue on education. For obvious reasons, it seemed like a topic which needed urgent attention - planning a magazine on the subject for February 2000 would be amusing perhaps but not exactly useful. Yet could I tear up my education project and go back to square one? I put the question to the editorial team at one of our regular weekly meetings, which now involve an open phone conference with Toronto and will soon include Adelaide as well. I sketched out how both issues would work, put the pros and cons with admirable balance and... and... my colleagues divided down the middle, putting the ball back in my court. Thanks a bunch. The solution I came up with was to continue with the education project but give over the central four pages of the magazine to a campaigning blast on the nuclear danger. This has changed the whole geography of the issue. It means, for example, that the education section has its factual graphics sprinkled throughout rather than collated on one setpiece visual. It also means there are two separate action pages (alarm call/action ideas and action) with extensive lists of ideas and contacts - even two separate campaigns which urge you to put pressure on governments by writing letters or postcards. But then you're always telling us you want to know how to help...
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Letters FRONT COVER PHOTO: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chris Brazier
for the New Internationalist Co-operative |
||||||||||||||||||||||

Granted
that describing the mechanics of magazine production would be a hit only with
chronic insomniacs, there is usually at least one tricky decision or ethical
dilemma involved somewhere in the creation of an issue that could usefully
be exposed to the light. 