Joy
is precious
Regarding the pictures on page
nine of Get it right! (NI
352). Here, for all to see, were the faces of people
who have dreamed the dream of wondrous things, and have awoken to
find them a reality. The picture filled my heart with an overwhelming
optimism, that at last beautiful things are starting to happen in
our world.
David
Harvey
Chippenham, England

Different
take
Thank you, thank you, thank you for the look at the US (The
Other America, NI
351). All my adult life I thought I wanted to get out
of my country, live anywhere but there. I hate being associated
with the policies of the Government. I do not want to belong to
the nation that is justifiably seen as the world’s bully.
I haven’t voted since 1976 because there’s never been
a clean candidate, someone I could vote for rather than against.
My sense of despair and anger has only increased since 9/11. I’m
tired. I’ve done this before, worked for peace and justice,
and it’s like I never bothered.
I’ve
been living in the UK for the last two years, trying to masquerade
as a Canadian because I can’t bear to be seen as an American.
Nor did I have the evidence that there were many others who feel
as I do, who know the election was stolen, who do not support war.
I know we’re there, but I can’t prove it to people who
only see the media images of gun-toting, knuckle-dragging, chest-beating
so-called patriots. You’ve looked at my country the same way
you’ve looked at other dictatorships – and found the
voices of dissent. I’m so grateful.
Karen
R Adams
Warwick, England

Brainwashed
NI 351 is
only a limited picture of the ‘other America’. Yes,
there are dissenters but for the most part US citizens do not dissent.
A former schoolmate of mine recently wrote ‘being an American
is pounded into our heads from Birth to Death... As Americans we
all feel Democracy is the only way to live in a country. Without
it you have nothing, no freedoms, no rights... materialism and captialism...
will always be our way of life... it’s really the American
Way and the American Dream.’
In
effect, my friend is saying they are ‘brainwashed’ and
he accepts it because he has money and the benefits that go with
it. He values ‘democracy’ and ‘freedom’,
but he has neither and doesn’t realize it. He is locked into
the rhetoric of his government. Yet the majority of citizens don’t
even bother to vote. Not only because the choice is only between
two ‘autocrats Tweedledum and Tweedledee’, but because
they know their opinions don’t really count. As long as they
get certain material benefits they are content.
Joe
Hanania
Nouic, France

The
right to dream
NI’s continuing attraction as a living testimony
to the right to dream was discreetly illustrated to me in a beautiful
and poetic fashion while devouring with gentle rapacity the refreshing
and contradicting (necessarily so) issue on the other
America (NI
351). Robin Kelly in particular highlighted the humanist
search outside all categorizations of post-colonialisms, neo-colonialisms,
Leftisms, activisms, fanaticisms, lost-isms. Poetic knowledge, as
Professor Kelly calls it, is that imagination, that effort to see
the future in the present. My eyes losing focus on the page, I suddenly
flipped the pages back to the inside front cover and read again
a quote from the upcoming issue by Raymond Williams: ‘To be
truly radical is to make hope possible, rather than despair convincing.’
While
the NI Co-operative has at times made us despair,
I feel that it remains a radical tool for a movement that needs
to dream some more, forgetting for just a moment the dogma from
both sides, all sides, of battlefield Earth. While Robin Kelly,
like Eduardo Galeano and so many other thinkers and activists, continues
to dream, I hope that the NI continues to travel with them.
Chris
Curnow
Georgetown, Guyana

The
other Americans
How about distinguishing between residents of the US and other ‘Americans’?
It feels most unsatisfactory to talk about ‘Americans’
without meaning to include Canadians, Jamaicans, Peruvians, Costa
Ricans or any other American population. Can anyone help me with
a more appropriate and sociologically sensitive term for residents
of the US? It is after all, just one of many countries that make
up the Americas.
Having
said this, I can only wonder about the impact of righting this grammatical
wrong. Would any proud citizen of South America, Latin America,
the Caribbean or Canada, really want to take ownership of the adjective
‘American’?
Stuart
Riddle
Bath, England

Documents
of control
When I saw your October issue (Refugees,
NI 350)
I was thrilled. I am thankful that you make such a good case for
open borders and an end to all this statist garbage about ‘undocumented
illegal aliens’. I have long been very sceptical of so-called
‘proper documents’ and the ideologies behind them. Maybe
at some point in time some authoritarian bugger will think I’m
an ‘illegal alien’ because I don’t have ‘ID’.
I’m more likely some sort of anarchist with serious doubts
about the validity of claims to power and authority.
Stewart
Jamieson
Yukon, Canada

Democracy’s
problem
The mention of Peter Davis’ suggestion in NI
350 that ‘detained asylum seekers should be used
for “live target practice”’ made me wonder about
democracy. Davis has been democratically elected mayor of Port Lincoln.
Most Western nations would have some democratically elected MPs
or public figures whose views are protectionist, nationalist and
probably racist. Where are you going to get a majority of voters
who will want to sacrifice some of the benefits they have, even
if these gains are bought at the price of exploitation of other
nations? I have been brought up to value both democracy and all
human beings – whether they be of my race, sex, socio-economic
status, geographical location or not – yet sometimes it seems
hard to reconcile these values.
Rachel
Langham
Wellington, Aotearoa/New Zealand

Would
it work?
Re Teresa Hayter’s article on open borders (‘The
new common sense’, NI
350). How would a country’s social-security system
work if unlimited numbers can move in? Will the people with most
need flock to countries with the more generous benefits while the
people with the most money move to tax havens thus making benefits
impossible to sustain? Individuals in desperate poverty may have
difficulty emigrating but what is there to stop governments putting
unwanted people on a plane with a one-way ticket? This form of assisted
emigration could be quite tempting in places where rapid population
increase puts unbearable pressure on natural resources.
As
for whether immigrants ‘swamp’ local populations and
cultures – Native Americans, Aboriginal Australians, the many
tribes and peoples that Survival International have campaigned for
would surely answer ‘yes’. Does immigration really ‘improve
job prospects and the wages and conditions of workers’? More
workers could mean lower wages. US agriculture ‘heavily dependent
on immigrants’ pays very low wages (indirectly putting British
farmers out of business – Britain has an Agricultural Wages
Board). Open borders would undoubtedly be good for some, but some
very difficult situations could be created.
Pam
Jones
Gloucester, England

Increase
aid
The arrival of refugees is a symptom of a much wider problem involving
far more than the trickle suggested by Teresa Hayter (NI
350). Most will never be able to escape their own country.
Some, like the Kurds, Armenians and Palestinians, are persecuted
by governments, while others have become victims of an equally heartless
economic system or an unstable climate.
If
we are to solve these problems we must increase our aid programmes
to disadvantaged countries via finance, expertise, training and
family planning. We may have to risk creating hostility with other
countries by demanding human rights for their oppressed populations
or supporting their dissident nationalists. Used in isolation, a
policy of rejecting or accepting refugees cannot work in a world
where the population is expected to grow to nine billion.
Don
Owers
Dudley, England

| the
only solution to the current conflict in Israel and Palestine
is ‘the end of Israeli occupation and settlements’ |
Deal
with reality
I agree with Tony Howard (Letters,
NI 350)
that the only solution to the current conflict in Israel and Palestine
is ‘the end of Israeli occupation and settlements’.
The comments of your other correspondent David Galbraith (also NI
350) condemn and trivialize the pain of an oppressed
people by pointing the finger at a ‘possible’ situation
had the Arab countries won and carried out their threats almost
half a decade ago.
That
didn’t happen and so the reality of ‘right now’
has to be considered. No peace can be achieved by dragging up the
wrongs, rights and maybes of the distant past. Forget the past when
the disinherited Palestinians were supported by their aggressive
Arab neighbours and consider the present where the Israeli Government
is being supported by the might of the US. Third parties in a conflict
always aggravate the situation – for example the Irish situation
in which England has dabbled for its own ends.
Margot
Salom
Brisbane, Australia

|