Abortion
and
understanding
I agree with Daniel Bampton (Letters, State
of Fear, NI 376)
that abortion is part of a wider issue of social inequality
and I don’t feel that to be anti-abortion is to be ‘anti-woman’.
He talks about abortion as though it exacerbates problems for
women. I don’t think that is true. Abortion is not available
to women in many countries where inequalities between men and
women are most prevalent. I don’t feel that discriminatory
abortion on the grounds of gender, for example, can be judged
the same way as abortion as a result of bad timing. As an ex-youth
worker running personal development programmes for young people ‘at
risk’, I have seen so many teenage girls, many of whom
were starting to turn their life around, drop out due to pregnancy.
Some of these girls are happy and supported and proud; but
many more are not in a position to cope, often suffering from
depression and giving up their plans for the future.
So
he is right, it is a bigger issue; it’s about equality
and responsibility and empowerment... but society isn’t
there yet. Women will have sex before they are ready, they
will have sex for the wrong reasons with the wrong people and
without feeling that they can insist on contraception, they
will get drunk, they will get raped, they will be unlucky,
they will be foolish... and until these ‘problems’ of
society are remedied, abortion is a necessary option for the
happiness and mental health of many women (and men). As someone
who had an abortion as a result of a pregnancy in which I had
no choice, and during which time nothing had ever felt so ‘wrong’,
I really feel that it is impossible for others to understand
what is essentially a very personal and difficult situation.
Clare
W London, England

Clout at the UN
Reforming the UN (The UN at 60, NI
375) could actually begin
in one country. There is an opportunity for the UK to use
its permanent
seat (hard to justify as it stands) in a truly powerful way
by placing it at the disposal of the Commonwealth – one
of the few international forums in which North and South
meet on equal
terms. The UN delegation from the Commonwealth could be elected
from constituencies of equal size, and given the power to elect
and direct the holder of the permanent seat.
It
would carry far more influence than all the other permanent members,
being the legitimate representative of around a billion
people including some of the poorest on the planet. And it
would not be entirely altruistic on our part: the British
people would
be closer to international institutions than ever before.
Alex
Lawrie Stoke sub Hamdon, England

Token elections
I read with interest The Unreported Year 2004 (NI
375).
In
your ‘Middle East’ section for March you correctly
noted that the Saudi Shura council announced women would be
allowed to vote in municipal elections. However, you did not
note that
in September this permission was cancelled. It is surmised
that because women were putting themselves forward to stand for
election
that permission for them to vote was annulled.
It
is also worth noting that it was for the first time in 40 years
that men were given the right to vote in these same municipal
elections.
However, the elections were delayed until November for Riyadh,
and February for the Eastern Province and into March for
Jeddah
and the Hejaz.
The
general excitement generated within the Kingdom over this resulted
in disparagement of the potential significance
of
elected municipalities
and the unlikelihood of their ever being influential over
anything more important than the placing of street lights – that
is, if they could obtain funding for lights in the first
place.
Name
and address supplied
|
We
have people here who believe that this should be 'a Christian
country' and anyone who doesn't agree should just 'get
out'
|
Creationism
1
Re Andrew Foster’s letter (NI
375), in which he expresses
disapproval of the tone adopted in a Seriously column concerning
the promotion of creationist theories in the US. I can appreciate
his concern about allowing people to express their religious beliefs;
however, I don’t think he understands how insidious the
Christian Right in this country is.
It’s important to discriminate between people who merely
identify as Christian, and those with a conservative political
agenda who use Christianity (or at least, their definition of it)
as leverage to impose their beliefs on the rest of the country.
The latter group is very consciously trying to shape this country
in a certain image – a rigid, moralistic, judgemental paradigm
where there is absolutely no room for anyone who doesn’t
adhere to their way of thinking.
We
have state-funded schools here where evolution is taught as merely
a ‘theory’, and creationism is given as a plausible
alternative. We have people here (and I have met plenty of them)
who believe that this should be ‘a Christian country’ and
anyone who doesn’t agree should just ‘get out’.
Whatever happened to freedom of religion?
The
promotion of creationism in the Grand Canyon sends the message
that the US Government sanctions evangelical Christian
beliefs
over all others. Do you think the Christian right would
tolerate the distribution of creation myths from other religions
and
cultures at the Grand Canyon?
Jennifer
Smith Chicago, US
2
The freedom to express religious beliefs often entails the promotion
of intolerant, sectarian or misogynist doctrines. Creationism,
which Andrew Foster cites as harmless, deserves ridicule not
only because it is a fantasy with as much basis in fact as any
other folk tale, but because it helps foster an atmosphere of
credulity.
It
causes harm to others as it encourages the dangerous belief that
people ought to accept whatever they are told without evidence.
I’m sure I don’t need to explain why that is a bad
thing.
Pól MacReannacháin Strabane, Ireland
Thoughtful
summary
We would like to express our thanks for Judeophobia (NI
372) – an
excellent and thoughtful summary. The issue was very timely and
needed: we also appreciate that this was a brave publication given
recent trends in the overt and covert expression of anti-semitism.
Jewish people – whatever their views on the need for a Jewish
state – need allies in order to fight all forms
of racism: this is the case for Jews working on the Left
as
well as for others.
Susie
Jacobs (Manchester Jewish Socialist network and Manchester jfjfp
[Jews for Justice for Palestinians]) with Ruth Abraham,
Jo Bird, Rica Bird, Sue
Cooper, David Graham, Clem
Herman,
Robert Lizar, David Marks, Abbie
Paton, Adam Jacob Trickey

Nuclear dumps
For 30 years the British Government had the sensible policy of
never
allowing their green and pleasant land to become a dumping ground
for the nuclear rubbish of other countries.
Here,
in South Australia, we know that feeling.
Our
federal government, however, was determined to foist a nuclear
dump upon us come what may, although they affected
a fond sensibility,
calling it by a gentler, less alarming name: a repository
for low-level nuclear waste.
For
years they kept up an unremitting campaign to overcome mounting
local resistance until, earlier in the year, with
a touch of pre-election
willies, they called the whole thing off.
Now
we learn that the British Government will bury Swiss, Swedish,
Spanish, Italian, German and Japanese waste,
as a profit-making
scheme to finance the dumping of its own growing mountains
of radioactive clutter, even though it lacks a suitable
site!
Could
these two government about-turns at opposite ends of the earth
be related in some way, one wonders?
And
why is
it that nobody
wants this lovely stuff?
Dave
Diss Glengowrie, Australia

|
Other
results of the Spanish-American War were the US occupation
of vast areas of Mexico and the occupation (lease?) of
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba - both of which continue today
|
US occupation
I wish to support George Richards (Letters, NI
375) in his call
for an article on the US conquest of the Philippines in 1899.
During
the Spanish-American War of the late 19th century, US forces
helped the Filipinos to conquer the forces of colonial Spain
that
had occupied the Philippines for nearly 300 years. Then, on 4
February 1899, US forces turned their guns on their Filipino
allies, causing
great bloodshed.
Richard
Brinsley Sheridan, an American eyewitness of the US aggression,
wrote a book to protest against US actions at the time.
He
wrote: ‘The Americans in 48 hours slaughtered more defenceless
people than did the Spaniards in two centuries... These people
[the Filipinos] fought for their freedom on the American side,
vanquishing at every point and at every zone the common enemy,
the Spanish nation; and in return what have they received? Treatment
worse than Spain inflicted in all her centuries of occupation;
cruelties, which no civilized power in the world could approve,
and of which the American people will be ashamed.’
It
should also be remembered that other results of the Spanish-American
War were the US occupation of vast areas of Mexico and
the occupation (lease?) of Guantanamo Bay, Cuba – both
of which continue today.
When
we look at the current behaviour of the US Administration in
Iraq, it must surely lead us to the conclusion that
some things never seem to change.
Andrew
Alcock Forestville, South Australia

Correction
In the world map included with the UN issue* (NI
375) we inadvertently omitted
Lebanon. We deeply regret the error.
*Paper edition of NI. |
