Green imperialism
In Papua New Guinea, conservation
groups have been creating the very problems they aim to solve.
Glenda Freeman wonders at their weird ways.
Once upon a time, in the not-too-distant
past, a bingo
decided to do nature conservation in the Wasi river basin, Papua
New Guinea. The place was an environmentalist’s dream. Lots
and lots of bush filled with a multitude of flying and biting things.
A diverse bunch of unwashed and scabrous people leading traditional
lives that they punctuated with stories and wars. No industry,
no logging or mining – just a virgin tract of scrub.
Looking at the planet from a distance, curious
people might ask why this area is forested and largely intact compared
with the
rest of the joint, for which the impartial scientific verdict is ‘stuffed’.
Well, no-one ever lived in the Wasi because they wanted to pass
their days savouring the delights of sago and fish three times
a day, while losing litres of blood to the mosquitos. No, the Wasis
were refugees thrown out of the highlands by nastier people who
had little land and didn’t want to share. Over the aeons
numerous groups took up residence in the swamps and lakes of the
Wasi, all of whom had one thing in common – a mutual detestation
of each other.
One must ask why the Wasis have not stuffed
the place up themselves. Are they, as some of our bingo friends
supposed, the possessors
of native wisdom that has allowed them to live in harmony with
nature for an interminably long time? Unfortunately not. They have
converted at least half of the Wasi forests to grassland by cooking
it whenever it has been dry enough to hold a spark. Later, they
exacerbated the local water-weed problems by covertly seeding their
neighbour’s rivers with the plants. They have welcomed any
organization willing to log, clear or mine, despite understanding
the likely outcome perfectly well. The distressing fact is that
the Wasis would have destroyed the place were it not for the malaria
and other parasites that kill most of their kids, sap their energy
and make them mad.
Well, a bingo (let’s call it the World Wildlife Fund, or
WWF, for the sake of accuracy) was moneyed up to the tune of a
few millions given to them by the Euro-Nation, which wanted to
balance its books – oh, and see some rainforest preserved
in the antipodes. What was the bingo going to do with its millions
on the ground, day by day, to achieve conservation and happiness
on the banks of the Wasi?
One school of thought was that it didn’t have enough money.
By the time the staff were employed and paid with travel and living
allowances there wasn’t much cash left over, and that was
needed to pay for fax paper and inter-office memoranda. The Wasis
were just going to have to be satisfied with motivational workshops
aimed at ‘cultural reinforcement’, when to them their
culture was just a way of surviving until something better came
along.
Another idea was to develop a resource centre
in the middle of the project area. It would house a good library
holding all sorts
of self-help development materials: How to Start a Butterfly
Farm in Three Easy Steps; A Beginner’s Guide to Small-scale Saw-milling.
A place for quiet study and idle reflection on the options available
to the average Wasi family. It would also hold cultural artefacts
and biological specimens from the area, so the locals could see
that others held their things in high esteem. Some said the Centre
would have a coffee shop and a sales outlet so the bingo wouldn’t
have to support it for too long. Some said that the place would
be robbed and cooked before it was finished – but they were
miserable cynics who had spent too much time in the bush.
| As long as the money keeps burning
and hardwood timber prices stay low, the bingo can point
to all that forest it's saved for the Wasi people |
There was a proposal to assist the Provincial
Government to plan for the future. However, the Provincial Government
had a problem
with cash. Millions arrived every year, but it always left without
anyone actually seeing it. The bingo believed that, given direction
and vision, the Government would be revitalized, repent and spend
the money wisely. The Government suggested the bingo could buy
them computers to enable them to keep track of their money. The last and most treasured idea was to
set up some model eco-projects in a few select villages. Village-based
saw-milling was an obvious
choice, to provide an alternative to the feared industrial logging.
Villagers harvesting their own timber are less likely to sell the
logging rights to the Malaysians – or so the theory goes.
The only difference is this: with one you get paid heaps just to
sit around, while with the other you get paid a pittance to work
your guts out for ever. You can see why the Malaysians were popular.
All this ignored the original situation.
The Wasis had unwittingly been excellent conservationists for a
long time. The best thing
the bingo could have done would have been to leave them alone,
while doing what they could to deter the nastier industries from
entering the region. In doing Conservation our bingo was creating
the problem it hoped to solve.
Several years later, and it has successfully
burned through a few million dollars. Staff mostly sit in the office – it’s
too hot to go out. Frustrated by its ineptitude, the Provincial
Government managed to pressure the project into dishing out water
supplies and other ‘cargo’ – goodies that arrive
out of the blue. The top-dog WWF bureaucrat – a cargo-thinker
of the highest rank – in the capital city, Port Moresby,
pushes the project to deliver even more cargo for the people, thereby
keeping them idle and dependent. As long as the money keeps burning
and hardwood timber prices stay low, the bingo can point to all
that forest it’s saved for the Wasi people. Dark glasses and fancy boots
The interest of conservation bingos in Papua New Guinea began some
time ago. They arrived as soon as some wise mind noticed how
much tropical forest was still here. They stepped in the door
in the early 1990s and at first tried to work with local groups.
But there were big problems. The local groups moved too slowly.
Some were downright cantankerous. None had anything close to
the capacity needed to handle projects of the requisite size.
So, some time during the 1990s, the international conservation
bingos decided to become colonialist.
When they set up shop in Port Moresby, the
green imperialists had to be careful. First order of business was
to find a black
face
to put on display. The fastest way to do that was to steal Papua
New Guineans from existing groups or government agencies. They
made sure they appended ‘PNG’ to their own acronyms.
Consultants came armed with laptops, cookbook steps to winning
the hearts of villagers, landscape ecology theory, planning notions
that made no sense at all to the villagers. Consultants who drowned
themselves in malaria prophylactics, sunscreen, dark glasses and
fancy boots; who breathed a sigh of relief if they could keep their
time in the village to a minimum.
Support really is needed for conservation
activities in Papua New Guinea. But right now a strong argument
can be presented that donors’ help
is more destructive than constructive. Donors like the Ford, MacArthur
and Packard foundations, or the Australian Government’s AusAID,
could be involved in supporting conservation and development in
positive ways. They could promote initiatives that effectively
spread information on conservation and development. They could
support work that directly addresses unequal power relationships
and involves a legion of Papua New Guineans, rather than a handful
of paid conservationists.
Local people get frustrated when donors
show them glazed smiles, glossing over the worst cases of mismanagement,
misappropriation
and downright incompetence while commenting on a few good things
that happened in spite of it all.
Stop giving money so unquestioningly to
the bingos! Stop funding giant projects! Most of all, don’t create organizations in
your own image. Simplicity, grassroots and small should be your
words of guidance – if you want to contribute to something
that really lasts. •
Glenda Freeman, a native of New Zealand/Aotearoa, is a freelance
writer with a long-standing interest in modern-day expressions
of colonialism. Chance encounters with Fijian NGO workers in 2001
stimulated her to start compiling stories and information on bingo
activities in Asia and the Pacific.
|